>>212
そのACERも当てにならないって話

mini LED液晶がどちらも凌駕する性能なのか、実証データがない
全白150cdぽっちでも、↓だそうだ
https://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php?subaction=showfull&;id=1559897568

Nevertheless, Sony A9G can deliver impressive HDR picture quality.
In 'Standard' mode it peaks at 860 nits, which is actually higher than the LG C9 sample we had next it.
In 'Movie' mode it sacrifices some brightness near the peak to bring out more detail in highlights.
In Movie mode it hits 650 nits peak brightness on a 2% window (2% of the screen is white, while the rest is black) and 572 nits with a 10% window.
As such the TV's ABL (Automatic Brightness Limiter) is more aggressive than LG's.
You can see our full peak brightness measurements in the measurements table.

In this context, it is important to note that unless a very large portion of the screen is bathed in strong light
you will actually experience these peak brightness levels while enjoying a movie or game in HDR because OLED can control the full luminance range on the pixel level.
That is in contrast to LCD TVs with a limited number of dimming zones (usually a few hundreds spread thin across millions of pixels).
Even the brightest LCD TVs that can hit 4000 nits on theoretical test patterns are unlikely to go beyond 1000 nits in many movie and game scenes,
and will hit levels far below OLED when it comes to illuminating small bright objects such as stars, lamps, reflections in surfaces etc.

We had a chance to compare Sony A9G and LG C9 side-by-side and in terms of HDR both deliver an impressive, and very consistent, HDR experience that overall surpass the best HDR-capable LCD TVs right now.
In Movie mode the LG C9 does appears slightly brighter in some segments, which can be attributed to its less aggressive ABL system, but the difference is hard to notice and you may not ever spot it unless you have the two TVs side-by-side.