And after all, Hyuga is primarily an antisubmarine combatant, planned under the eight ships/eight ASW
helicopters concept. It is essentially different from an aircraft carrier built for strike or air defense. In the
future, should Japan, in a changed security environment, need a (light) aircraft carrier within the scope of
the nation's constitution, it should build one. Even then, the government and the JMSDF would be obligated
to explain thoroughly its necessity to the Japanese people, to gain their full consensus and support. In
terms of healthy civilian control, the introduction of a new system or ship of such significance as a (light)
aircraft carrier should be accompanied by thorough and public discussion.

Yes, it is true that this ship has a through-deck and is the largest combatant in the JMSDF's history, but
it still is a helicopter destroyer, planned and built under the long-standing operational concept of the JMSDE
and it is not almighty. Hyuga is not, for reasons described in this article, a carrier in a traditional sense.
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/A+new+carrier+race%3F+Strategy%2C+force+planning%2C+and+JS+Hyuga.-a0260791374

＞お前は軍板ではもう下のスレ以外に書き込み禁止なwwwww

翻訳すると「妄想並べるだけで何も反論できない半可通ですから見逃してください」になるな。

お前さ、マジ生きてる価値ないな。