↑の記事におけるE-7の評価＠2018
E-3と同等の失敗かw
Thomas Newdick, Editor of Air Forces Monthly –
“While choice of the E-7 may seem an obvious one, there are compelling reasons to suggest the RAF should have looked elsewhere.
The E-7 is based on what’s now old technology. Aside from Australia, there’s little in the way of commonality with UK’s closest allies.
There are even question marks about inserting the existing technology into a new basic airframe (production of the 700 series has ended) and will it be possible to plumb it for a probe (like the E-3D has)?
Essentially, the UK is once again probably last in line to choose a specific AEW solution, as it was with the E-3, which then became a very expensive ‘upgrade vacuum’.
>>576
>うん、その上で空軍が要求したE-7は計画続行なんだわ
議会がロビーしていて
関係者はクビ?w

>いや、値段も性能もE-7 > グローバルアイ > E-2Dだよ
実際にフランスが選択したのはグローバルアイだよな？
現実を見ようw