>>641
あと、
＞This seems rather improbable,
以下は読みました？

徹甲爆弾が装甲貫徹した可能性があるかもといったん書いて
むしろありそうもない、インプロバブルだと言ってるんだけど
爆弾の炸薬の少なさと、最初の火災は水線上だというファクトからね


＞It is a possibility that one of the modified 16-Inch AP projectiles,
＞which the Japanese used for bombs, might have penetrated the 4-1/4-Inch STS armored deck and initiated a fire followed by a detonation of the smokeless powder magazines.
＞This seems rather improbable,
＞though, considering the small charge of explosive (less than 70 pounds of TNT) in this type of bomb, and the fact (pictures 46-208) that the initial fire was definitely above the waterline and of large-scale proportions.
＞
＞この部分ですね