>>102 Please post with in english. Automatic translater sometime translates as opposit meaning.
>>Codemonkey I'm going to leave here to clear black list. I should stop posting arround 16hours. Otherwise I could post only 1 post until someone post here, and the conditioin will be continued until I stop posting arround 16 hours(it means after Rokka become finalized). 0109C ◆Odemonkey. (プーアル茶)NGNG>>108 How does the black list work? Why does it put you on a black list? Thats dumb.
So far from our discussions, I will be adding the dat-ochi function.
Janestyle seems to be the only browser that was using the "raw" parameter. They had some kind of special permission to use it. I think having special permission to use features is not good. Lets remove the raw function, or make it available for everyone to use.
If you want, we can make a thread on bbspink. There are no post limits or black list on bbspink. 0110名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。(しうまい)NGNG>>85 確かにオプションは廃止してもいいですよね。
Here is a dat file on the client.
1 post A 2 post B 3 post C: that contains inappropriate words 4 post D 5 post E
Here is an up-to-date file on the sever.
1 post A 2 post B 3 post D 4 post E 5 post F 6 post G 7 post H 8 post I
The post C has been deleted by the administrator. The client requires "6-". And the server returns as below.
6 post G 7 post H 8 post I
Now the file on the client is as below.
1 post A 2 post B 3 post C: that contains inappropriate words 4 post D 5 post E 6 post G 7 post H 8 post I
The inappropriate POST C remains and POST F is missing. This is the reason why <OPTIONS> should not be used. 0111水玉(Mizutama) ◆qHK1vdR8FRIm (もんじゃ)NGNG>>109 > >>108 > How does the black list work? Why does it put you on a black list? Thats dumb. I described in >>37. I'm not clearly understanding it.
> So far from our discussions, I will be adding the dat-ochi function. \(^o^)/
> Janestyle seems to be the only browser that was using the "raw" parameter. They had some kind of special permission to use it. > I think having special permission to use features is not good. Lets remove the raw function, or make it available for everyone to use. I agree with you.
> If you want, we can make a thread on bbspink. There are no post limits or black list on bbspink. Yes please. てか、最初からそうしてくれればいいのにー 0112名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。(たこやき)NGNG 昔は転送量削減を重視して差分取得・gzip使用を組み込んでいたけど、 今は●流出分のレス削除とか時刻改竄・隠蔽重視で 有無を言わさずレス全取得が必須なのか 0113名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。(WiMAX)NGNG>>112 byte offse指定した差分取得でもあぼーんがあれば全取得されてたんだから 大して変わらんでしょ 0114水玉(Mizutama) ◆qHK1vdR8FRIm (もんじゃ)NGNG>>112 そこを議論していただきたいです。 twintailとしては全取得しかしないので蚊帳の外ですが。 いずれにせよCodemonkey氏(と私)との間では技術的観点より実装議論をしてテストするだけなので 直接Codemonkey氏に伝えていただくあるいは決議案をお知らせいただく(て私が伝える)なければ http://stream.bbspink.com/update.txt が http://2ch.tora3.net/about.html を満たしたと(私が満足した)ところまでで終了です、たぶん。 0115名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。(舞妓 どすえ)NGNG>>112 Rokkaというより、転送量が経費に直結かつ回収手段が十分でなかった頃からの歴史、 当時のネットワーク帯域、利用者数≒アクセス頻度等が絡んで優先度が転送量>鯖負荷だった経緯があるのかと 今は利用者数が桁違いに増えているせいで利用者一人辺りの鯖負荷を軽減する事が 最優先なんだと思われ、専ブラ使わずにアクセスした際のウェイトとか見てもそんな気がする