In conclusion we can say that they would have been perfect for the role they were designed that is to conduct tactical scouting for the battleships: they could have penetrated enemy escort screens easily and could cause swift and heavy damage then retreat as fast as they came.
で、結局はイギリスのCentaur級を基にしてオマハ級を作るに至る。 0323名無し三等兵2019/05/18(土) 23:59:45.29ID:SbId2bsH 要は、レキシントン級が巡洋艦キラーでは無いというのは間違いか 0324名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 00:10:51.01ID:9FPwGj6L>>321 レキシントンとして採用された設計図145がない、それ以前に検討された133や140もない。 完全に別系統だよこれ。 0325名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 00:23:41.99ID:9FPwGj6L 321のリンク先の図のうち一番右の3つ133,140,143がレキシントンに繋がる。 このあと145、169、番号無し1918/5/16、番号無し1919/3/13 0326名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 00:29:06.60ID:TQvADliL>>324 レキシントンの始まりはこれ Design No. 150, the starting point for LEXINGTON https://stefsap.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/kc3a9p4-1.jpg
それで150のもとになったのが、さっきの図の中の144 No. 150 was the refinement of No. 144 which laid out a medium sized battlecruiser ? and this version was chosen for further development by relevant decision makers. The date was 28th Sept 1915.
まとめると、 @まともな偵察艦隊を持たなかったアメリカは、様々なサイズの軽防御・高速の巡洋艦を検討した Aその中から実現したのが、6インチスカウトクルーザーであるオマハ級、14インチのバトルスカウトまたは キャピタルクルーザーであるレキシントン級 Bレキシントン級は、ユトランドの戦訓を受けて防御力を強化し主砲を16インチ化したが、 装甲は12インチ砲にも負けるレベル Cそれもそのはず、レキシントン級の任務は>316の通りの巡洋艦キラーだから 0327名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 00:32:21.16ID:TQvADliL>>325 まあ、この図はすべて偵察艦隊ファミリーだから、 レキシントンがこの図にルーツを持つというのなら、それは決戦兵力ではなくて あくまでも偵察艦ということだよ 0328名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 00:55:30.67ID:9FPwGj6L>>326 Preliminary Design No.150 for a 32,000 ton ship with a main battery of eight 14-inch guns in four twin turrets and a maximum speed of 35 knots. This plan was one of a series of preliminary designs exploring tradeoffs in scout cruiser capabilities. Such "Battle Scouts" were in effect small battle cruisers. No ship was built to this design, but the later Lexington (Battle Cruiser # 1) class design was similar in hull layout.
Preliminary Design No.145 for a 35,500 ton ship with a main battery for eight 14-inch guns in four twin turrets and a maximum speed of 30 knots. The design selected for construction of the Lexington (Battle Cruiser # 1) class followed this general layout. 0329名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 01:06:28.98ID:9FPwGj6L In the event, none of these designs led to the selection of a concept for construction. Instead, the Navy chose to develop a new design based on destroyer design principles, smaller than most of the designs considered in the "Scout Cruiser Study". This design became the Omaha (Scout Cruiser # 4) class that served from completion during the 1920s through the end of World War II. 0330名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 01:24:32.81ID:KkvQRSJc>>326 なんでそんなサイトから引いてきたの? 図も元々他のサイトのでしょ。 0331名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 01:26:18.13ID:TQvADliL>>328 なるほどね 系統について違うことを言っている別ソースがあると
This design was based on the hull design developed earlier for P.D. 144 (see Photo # S-584-083) and 150 (see Photo # S-584-089). 0332名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 02:25:26.17ID:tmpjNnMg 【速報】楽天ポイント150Pがすぐ貰える
原油を加熱しなければ燃料として使えないのに加熱装置が砲戦で破壊されたとか。 0335名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 06:38:30.04ID:wvTNLgmW だからC重油なんて使って節約とかセコいことを考えずに 灯油のJP8を使えと言ったのに、、、 0336名無し三等兵2019/05/19(日) 07:19:53.70ID:fMdg8yq8>>316 Don’t forget that due to early AP shell’s unreliability meant penetrations in excess of 229mm not too likely, even at relaitvely short battle ranges The case of the 3 BCs sunk at Jutland turned out recently to be due to insufficient cordite stability and less then aduqate flash protection. From a range or torpedo defense point of view the LEXINGTON in it’s final form would have outclassed any built or planned battlecruiser.
In conclusion we can say that they would have been perfect for the role they were designed that is to conduct tactical scouting for the battleships: they could have penetrated enemy escort screens easily and could cause swift and heavy damage then retreat as fast as they came.